TL;DR
- Buffer:
- $6-120/mo. Per-channel monthly.
- FairPost:
- $0.10-0.25/post. No subscription. Full features from day one.
A Buffer alternative that charges what it costs.
Buffer charges $6-120/mo. The infrastructure to run social media scheduling — servers, APIs, storage, delivery — costs roughly $0.005/post. FairPost charges $0.10-0.25/post. No subscription. No seat limits. No annual contract.
Why people leave Buffer
Per-channel pricing adds up
Analytics behind higher tiers
Free tier is quite limited
FairPost vs Buffer
| FairPost | Buffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per use | Per-channel monthly |
| Price | $0.10-0.25/post | $6-120/mo |
| Free tier | Free actions included | 3 channels, 10 scheduled posts |
| Contract | None | Monthly available |
| Zero-usage month | $0 | Still charged |
| Feature gating | All features included | Some features gated |
| Infrastructure cost | $0.005/post | Not disclosed |
What it actually costs to run
The infrastructure cost for social media scheduling — servers, APIs, storage, delivery — is roughly $0.005/post. Buffer charges $6-120/mo.
Fair charges $0.10-0.25/post — cost plus a small margin.
When to choose which
Choose Buffer if
Solo creators and small teams wanting simple scheduling
Choose FairPost if
You want social media scheduling without a subscription. FairPost charges $0.10-0.25/post. Use a lot? Pay a little more. Use nothing? Pay nothing. All features included from the first use.
Where Buffer gets expensive
- Per-channel model means costs grow with platform count
- Basic analytics on lower plans
Switch from Buffer. Keep the features. Lose the subscription.
FairPost — $0.10-0.25/post. No subscription. No seat pricing. No annual contract. Your first actions are free.
Related comparisons
Fair is the anti-subscription. 13 tools, one account, pay for what you use.